It turns out that Belle and Honest John have a past. John was once known as Gentleman Jack, a con man…currently wanted by the Seattle police. From there I just got confused. There’s something about a con involving a slimy gambler and a ton of gold dust. Meanwhile, Pop is trying to get rid of Steve…thinking he’s courting his daughter while actually having a wife and kids back in Seattle. This is reason enough to have him arrested, apparently. It’s very easy to get lost in this muddled storyline.
But the biggest problem with the film is that almost the entire cast lack any depth or emotion. Randolph Scott, Gypsy Rose Lee, and Dinah Shore all look like mannequins…incapable of anything remotely resembling an expression. There is nothing about their performances than invites you into their story…and that’s a huge problem for a movie to have. The only exception is Bob Burns who has a handful of great comedic moments with Guinn “Big Boy” Williams, playing the local marshal.“Belle of the Yukon” is a western that is completely devoid of action, a comedy that has almost no laughs, and a musical that contains some of the least memorable songs ever. But hey…nominated for two Academy Awards!








This really does seem a forgotten, and forgettable, film – I wasn’t aware until I saw it a few years ago that Gypsy Rose Lee had actually made some movies. As you note, the action is confusing and unmemorable, and Scott is wasted. About the only feature that stuck out for me was the flamboyant design for Lee’s costumes (if anything should have gotten a nomination, it should have been for that).